L’affaire Vargas PDF

The outcome of the ruling is that an Internet search engine must consider requests from individuals to remove links to freely accessible web pages resulting from a search on their name. If the search engine rejects the request, the individual may ask relevant authorities to consider the case. Under certain conditions, the search engine may be ordered to l’affaire Vargas PDF the links from search results.


« Mentalement, aucune originalité, aucune imagination, mais une seule et unique chose, celle-là absorbant toute la substance de son âme… Un raisonnement froid et fluide qui parvenait à contourner les aspérités de la réalité en les dessinant, presque involontairement, d’un trait léger ». La malle de Pessoa ne cesse de livrer des trésors étonnants. Voici que le poète, le dramaturge, le penseur nous apparaît aussi auteur de littérature policière. Duel d’intelligence, L’affaire Vargas est le plus ambitieux de ses textes consacrés à ce genre. Raisonneur presque désincarné, le docteur Quaresma y enquête sur un meurtre lié aux plans d’un sous-marin. Et nous offre un exposé diaboliquement logique sur la psychologie pathologique, qui préoccupait tant Fernando Pessoa.

The General Data Protection Regulation was mooted to include a right to be forgotten, but between the draft and the final version this was changed to a right to request erasure for a set of specific reasons. In 1998 the Spanish newspaper La Vanguardia published two announcements in its printed edition regarding the forced sale of properties arising from social security debts. One of the properties described in the newspaper announcements belonged to Mario Costeja González, who was named in the announcements. In November 2009, Costeja contacted the newspaper to complain that when his name was entered in the Google search engine it led to the announcements.

He asked that the data relating to him be removed, arguing that the forced sale had been concluded years before and was no longer relevant. Costeja then contacted Google Spain in February 2010, asking that the links to the announcements be removed. Google Spain forwarded the request to Google Inc. California, United States, taking the view that this was the responsible body. The Audiencia Nacional joined the actions and stayed the proceedings pending a preliminary ruling from the CJEU on a number of questions regarding the interpretation of the Data Protection Directive. These questions fell into three groups.

All of these questions, also raising important points of fundamental rights protection, were new to the court. Because new points of law were involved, the opinion of an advocate general was sought by the court. Written proceedings followed by an oral hearing were held on 26 February 2013, at which, besides the parties, the governments of Austria, Greece, Italy, Spain and Poland and the European Commission gave their opinion. Advocate General Niilo Jääskinen gave his opinion on 25 June 2013, after which judgment was given on 13 May 2014.

This entry was posted in Romans et littérature. Bookmark the permalink.